In message <017f01c02503$b1bf2e80$1bc91440@sciencekit.com>, Bob Ammerman
<RAMMERMAN@PRODIGY.NET> writes
>Close, but I'm pretty sure the 16C84 was eeprom, not flash based.

Yes, the 16C84 was EEPROM based, but isn't the 16F84 EEPROM based as
well?. They just changed the name to 'Flash' to compete with other
manufacturers who call their EEPROM products Flash as well!.
--

Nigel.

        /--------------------------------------------------------------\
        | Nigel Goodwin   | Internet : nigelg@lpilsley.co.uk           |
        | Lower Pilsley   | Web Page : http://www.lpilsley.co.uk       |
        | Chesterfield    | Official site for Shin Ki and New Spirit   |
        | England         |                 Ju Jitsu                   |
        \--------------------------------------------------------------/

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu