Best Andy, Thank you too, for an answer ! The technology "behind" the PC is not so important. It is the method of = insulating it that should be small and smooth. It is a problem to wire = up bulky boxes just for the sake of the isolation. All the best Sven in Sweden -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Fr=E5n: Andrew Kunz Till: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU Datum: den 20 september 2000 13:04 =C4mne: Re: [EE]: Opto-isolated Ethernet connection > > > >Is _Ethernet_ really necessary? I used to work for a military = installation in >the late 80's, and we used Token Ring on fiber for our LAN. > >Andy > > > > > > > > > > >Richard Prosser on 09/19/2000 = 04:10:19 PM > >Please respond to pic microcontroller discussion list = > > > > > > > > > To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU > > cc: (bcc: Andrew Kunz/TDI_NOTES) > > > > Subject: Re: [EE]: Opto-isolated Ethernet connection > > > > > > > > >Math Associates used to supply a wide range of small optical fibre TX = and >RX units designed for short range (10s of metres) as well as the longer >range suff. You might find plastic fibre preferable to glass also as it = is >easier to handle and launch into. The lower bandwidth and higher loss >shouldn't be a problem over the short distances you're probably looking = at. >When I was involved the more common units were RS232 & Analogue links = but I >imagine by now (10 years later !) ethernet would also be available. > >I have seen designds that use a high intensity light powering a remote = unit >via an optical fibre and some special sort of photo detector - close = to >the ultimate in isolation! > >Richard P > > > > > > > > > >Sorry to trouble you with this OT, but I feel there is an answer "Out >There" that I have failed to find. > >I have several computer applications that are both connected to a = patient >(basically) and a network for storing data on a server. For patient = safety >reasons the PC is isolated (including measuring electronics), but the >system is not isolated unless the ethernet connection is run through a >fiber - or something. > >The optofiber interfaces we use are too bulky, and inteded to run = optical >fibers for a substancial length. Not a 2 meter fibre. > >My question to you is, is there a j45 (or-whatever-they-are-called)- >connector with a optical isolator(/-coupler) in it? It really shouldn't >have to more than a 1 " cube. > >OR a network-card, that has this built in (4kV isolation preffered). > >OR is this a neat PIC-project to put in que ? (SEE it isn't off = topic!!). >Opto for data, and a "high" frequency transformer for powering the = isolated >side would be what is in that cube.... > > >Sven G Milton >Milton Medicinteknik KB >Herrestad -- http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics (like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics