Bob Ammerman wrote:
>Ok, the MChip spec sheets go to great trouble to define the state of various
>registers on a reset.
>
>The 'wisdom' here is that you ignore that and reinitialize them anyway.
>
>Is this really needed?
>
>What next, are we going to assume that ADDWF won't correctly add 2 + 2.
>


What next is that you can write a callable routine that initializes all
the registers to a known state, and then call this routine - in s.w. -
whenever you want to get the processor back into that state. Has nothing
to do with "faith".

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
"[PIC]:" PIC only "[EE]:" engineering "[OT]:" off topic "[AD]:" ad's