On 13 Sep 2000, at 14:59, James Paul wrote:

>  Jamie,
>
>  I'm not Andy, but I am the author.  Your points are well taken, but
>  due to the fact that this is a PICLIST and not an IBM CLONE LIST, I
>  naturally assumed we were talking about PIC programs.  Most of the
>  programs I have written are less than a hunderd lines or so.  And
>  I wouldn't call it spaghetti code at all.  They are rather logical
>  and coherent, and most importantly, they do the job they were
>  designed to do.  And they are stable and well behaved.  As far as
>  maintaining them, the changes are minimal.

Here here.
I was looking at this growing rowl and thinking... this is a PIC
environment, wincy little memory available and limited stack.

Time for a reality check.

By all means comment the source code, draw a logic diagram and
try to keep the code in discrete blocks but gotos are reality at this
level, cope with it.

All flames re above to be addressed to Bill Gates, Microsoft corp
( he needs more problems).
_____________________________

Lance Allen
Technical Officer
Uni of Auckland
Psych Dept
New Zealand

www.psych.auckland.ac.nz

_____________________________

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu