I can appreciate your comments, and I understand that you feel that the use of OSI layers to divide up the IO routines is not a good idea, but could you take a look at the page at http://www.piclist.com/../microchip/ios.htm aka http://www.piclist.com/techref/default.asp?url=microchip/ios.htm and tell me what you would find clear. E.g. I'd like to get constructive advice on how to do it rather than on how not to do it. James Newton, PICList Admin #3 mailto:jamesnewton@piclist.com 1-619-652-0593 phone http://www.piclist.com ----- Original Message ----- From: Alan B. Pearce To: Sent: Monday, September 04, 2000 09:48 Subject: Re: [PIC]: PWM code at Piclist.com? Where? >Click on "PIC FAQ". Click on "Routines / Code library / Input/Output" , >Click on "Input/Output", Scroll down to "OSI 1 - Physical layer - >interfacing " and click on "PIC PWM". >Please tell me at what point along that path you got lost so I can make it >more clear. And how could it be made easier to navigate? Hmm, to be fair to the original poster of the question, I would not have looked under "OSI physical layer" for PWM code. I would thought the heading given above was just OSI layer interfacing, and not all forms of interfacing. Please do not get me wrong, I have not yet had occasion to seriously try and find something in the FAQ. This is just my immediate thought on looking at the above list without trying to follow the tree. I do appreciate that it is difficult to satisfy everyone, while also satisfying the KISS principle. -- http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic: "[PIC]:" PIC only "[EE]:" engineering "[OT]:" off topic "[AD]:" ad's -- http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic: "[PIC]:" PIC only "[EE]:" engineering "[OT]:" off topic "[AD]:" ad's