sounds like something i came across couple of months back try here i think its a surething.... http://www.hobbytron.net/R-PIC-1.html if it is this one then it is parrallel and you can get and updated schem and soft here... http://www.hobbytron.net/R-PIC-1.html if it does look like try comparing the board with the schem just to make sure its not "badged" up. hope it helps Phil Adams IT / E-Commerce Manager pa@corporate-gifts.co.uk WH Business Gifts ----- Original Message ----- From: "D Lloyd" To: Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 2:33 PM Subject: [PIC]: Anybody have any information on an old picpro? > > > Hi, > > We have one of these devices but I cannot get access to it at present to answer > your question. My colleague and I remember it being parallel but dont hold us to > that! > The software, if I remember, is DOS based and I do have a copy of it floating > about somewhere.......I'll look it up and send it directly to you. > > Regards, > > Dan > > > > > > |-------------> > |(Embedded | > |image moved | > |to file: | > |pic20103.pcx)| > | | > |-------------> > >------------------------------------------------------------------------| > |Henry Cipolla | > |01/09/2000 02:05 PM | > >------------------------------------------------------------------------| > > > > Please respond to pic microcontroller discussion list > > To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU > cc: (bcc: Dan Lloyd/GBPTD/ABB) > Subject: [PIC]: Anybody have any information on an old picpro? > > Security Level:? Internal > > > > I obtained an old Microchip PicPro from an flea market at MIT, but it > did not come with any documentation or information of any sort. It is a > Microchip PicPro 16C5X series programmer. Does anybody know of any > software for it (Any operating system), or even what port it uses? The > connector looks like a serial port, but it could also be a wrong gender > parallel port for all I know. Microchip of course has offered me no > support. There is no mention of "PICPRO" on the website and they do not > respond to any e-mails. Any information regarding this peice of > equpiment would be more then useful, as it is too light to work as a > paperweight, and I'd had to have it be absoultely useless! > > -- Henry > > -- > http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different > ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details. > > > > > > -- http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.