AndyK wrote:
>>Yeah, I think this is the answer. PIC and Scenix have been marketed
>>as having deterministic timing, in the sense that you could know
>
>"Easily determined" and "deterministic" are NOT identical.  I can easily write
>non-deterministic code for which the timing is easily determined, and
>deterministic code which can be very tedious to determine the cycle count w/o a
>simulator or ICE.
..........
>Please check a definition on determinism.  There's more than isochronicity that
>we are talking about here.
>
>Andy
>


Hi Andy, I am re-posting my original question here?

At 07:26 AM 08/21/2000 -0400, you wrote:
>So who uses assembly any more?  I do almost everything in C.
>
>Andy
>

Can you get **reliable** deterministic timing in C?

Over and out,
- danM

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu