>At the risk of starting a flame war...

>Real (wo)men code in assembly (or if they are extra tough, binary) :-)


>Just kidding of course. Both asm and "C" have their place. For typical
>applications "C" is fine, but when you are trying to get the most possible
>function out of the least possible hardware, you can't beat asm. (see my sig
>line to figure out where I prefer to be).

I used to work on a machine where the assembler was known as REAL. It stood for
RElocatable Assembly Language. Anyone else here who used to work on QANTEL
systems???

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu