Open source yes: but the focus seems to be on a stck [stack without all the
pieces :-)] on the chip itself.

----- Original Message -----
From: Andrew Kunz <akunz@TDIPOWER.COM>
To: <PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2000 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: [PIC]: How about an open-source emWare like product?


> Bob,
>
> I came to the exact opposite conclusion.  We have somebody setting up a
domain
> for open-source PIC software, and the first project on the table is your
> proposition.
>
> Andy
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Bob Ammerman <RAMMERMAN@PRODIGY.NET> on 06/16/2000 01:57:04 PM
>
> Please respond to pic microcontroller discussion list
<PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  To:      PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>
>  cc:      (bcc: Andrew Kunz/TDI_NOTES)
>
>
>
>  Subject: Re: [PIC]: How about an open-source emWare like
>           product?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Oh well, it looks like this thread has more or less devolved into an 'I
can
> build tha TCP/IP stack in N bytes' situation. My original question seems
to
> have been lost in the (very interesting and informative) noise.
>
> It seems that there is little interest in building an open-source emWare
> like product, which would provide a 'write-once' implementation of many of
> the components required to allow simple microcontroller based products to
> communicate in an I/in(ter,tra)net.
>
> Bob Ammerman
> RAm Systems
> (high function, high performance, low-level software)