It appears from what I have read that there is actually no formal
definition of what "ramdom" means, and that the only thing we really know
is that a certain source yields a given distribution, and there is
considerable dispute over whether, in fact, one can assume that
quantum-mechanical sources are "truely" random, in the sense of being
unpredictable or not following laws. Have a look at:

http://www.io.com/~ritter/REALRAND/REALRAND.HTM#EssenRand

Sean

At 03:10 PM 4/18/00 PDT, you wrote:
>true random numbers (generated from radioactive decay or somesuch) are both
>unpredictable AND statistically random, but they're not so easy to get.
>
>BillW
>
|
| Sean Breheny
| Amateur Radio Callsign: KA3YXM
| Electrical Engineering Student
\--------------=----------------
Save lives, please look at http://www.all.org
Personal page: http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/shb7
mailto:shb7@cornell.edu ICQ #: 3329174