Scott Dattalo wrote:
>
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Paul B. Webster VK2BZC wrote:
>
> > Dmitry Kiryashov wrote:
> >
> > > In common case it can be handled like following:
> >
> > >         test_some_condition
> > >         goto    $+2
> > >         goto    label
> >
> > > I also can't understand the reasons to introduce this
> > > sophisticated trick with pcl related skip into programming.
> >
> >   He was indicating that they wished to avoid potential problems on
> > chips where GOTO is dependent on PCLATH.
>
> Perhaps. However, his example had a goto too. Besides, if Dmitry can't think of
> reason for it then there probably isn't one!

Yep. It is possible but I don't know the way finally omit all gotos in code
written for PIC ;)

WBR Dmitry.