On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Paul B. Webster VK2BZC wrote:

> Dmitry Kiryashov wrote:
>
> > In common case it can be handled like following:
>
> >         test_some_condition
> >         goto    $+2
> >         goto    label
>
> > I also can't understand the reasons to introduce this
> > sophisticated trick with pcl related skip into programming.
>
>   He was indicating that they wished to avoid potential problems on
> chips where GOTO is dependent on PCLATH.

Perhaps. However, his example had a goto too. Besides, if Dmitry can't think of
reason for it then there probably isn't one!

Scott