>
> Well, Lance, the difference is, here in american universities,
> they teach terrific structured, top-down, modular programming
> technique, using a pseudo-code step translated in final Pascal
> code *ONLY* after the pseudo-code is known to be bug-free and
> structured perfectly. After which, the Pascal simply falls right
> out automatically, almost without looking. Aks any CS100 professor.
> [BTW, that's aks, not ask].
>
> Once you learn to do this right, anything else is easy. Shoot,
> my last project had 400 total pages (about 20,000 lines) of
> source code, including PC code, PIC code, and Scenix code, and
> by using those few simple, easily-remembered CS100 techniques,
> I just grinned all the way through it. Botta bing.
>

Well, I guess we dont know nuffing.
ICEs are for morons and eight thousand line programmes
are a piece of piss.
I dont believe a hardware intensive- interactive
environment will play ball they way you insist.


BTW top down structured programming was being taught
in NZ 13 years ago, the inventors of the technique came
down here and established it here then. I have been using
this technique for 8 years now.
New Zealand is not a nation of morons, the worlds first
4GL was invented by NZers.. incase you forgot.

And thanks for the spelling lesson.
_____________________________

Lance Allen
Technical Officer
Uni of Auckland
Psych Dept
New Zealand

www.psych.auckland.ac.nz

_____________________________