You got lost!  It was pandemonium over here.

 The answer is: don't replace the IP address with an IP address. Replace it
 with the domain name.

There were several IP addresses being used but don't use IP addresses
anymore - use http://academic1.bellevue.edu . The IP addresses that were
replaced (and are not necessary valid anymore) were:

204.233.101.40 (as in http://204.233.101.40/robots/robotsandstuff.html  <-
not valid anymore )
192.195.23.217 ( "" )
216.217.248.50 ( "" )



Dan Creagan

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: James Newton <jamesnewton@piclist.com>
> To: <dcreagan@SCHOLARS.BELLEVUE.EDU>
> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2000 9:39 AM
> Subject: RE: [OT] Solderless breadboarding...
>
>
> > Errr... I got lost. What is the current IP address that I should be
> > replacing with academic1.bellevue.edu ?
> >
> > ---
> > James Newton mailto:jamesnewton@geocities.com 1-619-652-0593
> > http://techref.massmind.org NEW! FINALLY A REAL NAME!
> > Members can add private/public comments/pages ($0 TANSTAAFL web hosting)
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pic microcontroller discussion list
> > [mailto:PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU]On Behalf Of Dan Creagan
> > Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2000 08:14
> > To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> > Subject: Re: [OT] Solderless breadboarding...
> >
> >
> > The link provided by Rich (http://www.rhoent.com/sbb.htm) shows a nice
> > printed circuit board for $11.25. On that same page is a link to how to
> > limit noise on an SBB (which I missed it the first time I looked at the
> > site - the discussion is at: http://www.rhoent.com/sbbnote3.htm - thanks
> > Rich!).
> >
> > An alternative to the $11.25 board is a $3 Radio Shack board which
> > is almost the same design and it is local. However, it is not nearly the
> > same quality.  For experimenting, I have found them adequate (the
cheaper
> > boards). Just be careful heating the traces because they lift pretty
> > easily - not usually a problem on the first try, but board reworks can
be
> > risky.  The Shack also has some other experimenter boards that
> > might fill your bill.  These  boards seem to be one of the few things I
> > visit the Shack for - I haven't found any other source that is as cheap
> > (there just has to be, though - anyone know of one?).
> >
> > Dan Creagan
> >
> > PS: my new (yet again) web site is finally going to have a domain name.
It
> > comes with yet another change of IP address. Any previous references
> > will be invalid after the end of the month.  The new site
> > is http://academic1.bellevue.edu/robots/sigrobots.html .
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Richard Ottosen <rottosen@IDCOMM.COM>
> > To: <PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
> > Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 7:51 PM
> > Subject: Re: [OT] Solderless breadboarding...
> >
> >
> > > Jeffrey Siegel wrote:
> > >
> > > > I've been messing around with a PIC based system, using op amps to
> > amplify a
> > > > small signal...digitize it....all kinds of fun stuff!  This is my
> first
> > time
> > > > doing this type of thing...
> > > >
> > > > Anyway, I'm getting a fair amount of noise after the
> amplification...I'm
> > > > wondering if it could be the big white solderless breadboard that
I'm
> > using.
> > > > I figured that it would be easier to try things on it but now I'm
> > wondering
> > > > if all these big traces are just magnets for noise.  What do you
pro's
> > use
> > > > when you are trying things out?  Wirewrap seems so much slower
> (although
> > > > I've never done it).
> > > >
> > > > Any suggestions?
> > >
> > > Try looking at   http://www.rhoent.com/sbb.htm
> > > There should be some information there to help you along.
> > >
> > > -- Rich
> >
>