O.K...so I lied a little. It does matter if you want to keep the chook
alive. Do you???

-----Original Message-----
From: TIM [mailto:stm800@CITY-NET.COM]
Sent: Friday, 11 February 2000 7:39
To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: Chickens [NOT OT!]


turn the caps off really anoying us near sited people......c'mon now.
-----Original Message-----
From: John Orhan <JOrhan@EDM.COM.AU>
To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU <PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Date: Thursday, February 10, 2000 10:34 PM
Subject: Re: Chickens [NOT OT!]


>LOOK GUYS....A CHOOK MAY JUST WALK AROUND AL DAY MAKING MEASUREMENTS
>DIFFICULT, BUT THEY'VE GOT TO SLEEP SOMETIMES....YES? AND THASTS MY WHOLE
>POINT REALLY, WEIGHT DOESN'T MATTER WHEN YOUR AVERAGING ALL THE CHICKEN.
AND
>IT CERTAINLY DOESN'T MATTER WHEN THEY'RE BEING SMAHED AGAINST A WALL......
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ryan Pogge [mailto:rpogge@MICHAELANGELO.NET]
>Sent: Friday, 11 February 2000 5:55
>To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>Subject: Re: Chickens [NOT OT!]
>
>
>weight does matter grasshopper!
>not all chickens wiegh the same. hence the point of trying to weigh them in
>the first place!
>
>
>> ARE YOU LISTENING!! wEIGHT DON'T MATTER!! CHICKEN WEIGHS SAME!!!
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Covick [mailto:dac@WEST.NET]
>> Sent: Friday, 11 February 2000 2:23
>> To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>> Subject: Re: Chickens [NOT OT!]
>>
>>
>> > Ryan,
>> >
>> > My solution is this...........
>> >
>> > Before market,  weigh out a hundred or so by hand... average the
>> > numbers.
>> > this is to make sure they are at optimum weight before market,
providing
>> > maximum proffit.
>> >
>> > This takes care of all the solutions thus far.
>> >
>> > Some things never change :)
>> >
>>
>> Why not just build-up a few PIC based scales to do the math?......and pay
>a
>> hungry college student to catch chickens?.......Ryan...you must know a
>few?
>> :)