Don Holtz wrote:

>Just a thought about your XOR encryption:
>
>Are you trying the render the encrypted channel unintelligable?
>
>My gut feeling is that by using a simple byte-by-byte XOR method, the
>encrypted sound will still be very easy to undertand.  XOR does not alter
>the overall cadence, or frequency content of the sound very much.
>
>To do it properly it is best to distribute the sound energy in both time
>and frequency.
>
>You might want to test a quick implementation of your scheme on a PC
>first... to see how it works.... I would like to hear the results!

----------

I tried it, and you're right, Don, the sound is stull understandable.... You
can see the results of my 'efforts' at:
http://www.bzzzzzz.com/beehive/keelanl/xortest/

- Keelan Lightfoot