Andy,

Windows NT is orders of magnitude more reliable and more secure than any
Windows 9x products.
I have plenty of real, working, hands-on expertise with Windows NT and I'd
be more than glad to exchange some messages about this if you want. We can
continue off-list or, if you want, in the montanadesign list, but please,
not in the PIClist.

Thanks a lot for listening.

Regards,
Andres Tarzia
Technology Consultant, SMART S.A.
e-mail: atarzia@smart.com.ar

-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Kunz [mailto:support@MONTANADESIGN.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 1999 18:24
To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: [OT] WIN95


At 05:13 PM 10/27/1999 -0400, you wrote:
>Well, if you can get it used then it'll be cheaper, but if you want a
>new copy it's the same cost as win98.  Is there a reason to go with 95
>as opposed to 98?

Yes, it's much more reliable.  Also more secure - you should see how many
messages I get from M$ about holes in their products, esp NT and 98 and
related apps (like Internet Exploder).

Andy

==================================================================
 Eternity is only a heartbeat away - are you ready?  Ask me how!
------------------------------------------------------------------
andy@rc-hydros.com      http://www.rc-hydros.com     - Race Boats
andy@montanadesign.com  http://www.montanadesign.com - Electronics
==================================================================