>I think we should not fork the list further if the list-master do not
>mind accomodating those areas that you are setting out to achieve.
>Otherwise most of us  would end up subscribing to all the forks.
>Useful contents would not go up but work does and noise does.

Ling,

I appreciate your comments.  There was an off-list discussion recently
among a handful of us discussing the future (even continued existence) of
the MIT PIC list.  This list.

In order to prevent losing this valuable resource, I put up an alternate list.

Some of the top names on this list are already subscribed, so the quality
will be there.  Most of the others are "lurkers" that is, they read but
don't post very often, if ever.

I invite you to at least look at the list.  If the MIT list eventually does
go away, you won't be out in the cold.  That's what I was especially afraid of.

Again, the address of the information on this new list is found at:

        http://www.montanadesign.com/maillist.html

Andy


==================================================================
 Eternity is only a heartbeat away - are you ready?  Ask me how!
------------------------------------------------------------------
andy@rc-hydros.com      http://www.rc-hydros.com     - Race Boats
andy@montanadesign.com  http://www.montanadesign.com - Electronics
==================================================================