Thomas Brandon wrote:
> Sorry for the long OT I just get frustrated by the number of people out
> there with misconceptions such as this. Oh, and I'm not trying to have a go
> at those who have these misconceptions, more those who spread them (and I'm
> not referring to Andy here, I'm referring to the magazines and web pages).
>
> Tom.

Thomas, your explaination about the versions was nice, and I thank you
for that. Tomorrow morning I will try to explain to one of our pentium
(Intel 233MHz) computers (2GB, 64MB) what misconception is, so then I
guess, Win98 will finally complete installation. I also guess that
computer already understand misconception related to WIn95, because it
install easy and fast. I don't know about other world reality, my
reality surrounds me, and at my reality arena Win98 doesn't work, and it
is not because what a magazine says.  I have a friend that says; "A
person who doesn't need to use eye glasses can't understand how
difficult is the world to who needs it.  Perhaps my computers have
something that is not compatible with WIn98, but the quality of the
water I taste (and drink) at my home's faucets, not at my neighbor's.
Toshiba needed to upgrade its notebooks power control software to be
compatible to Win98, ok, it just took me hours to find out why after
install a win98 at my notebook it is just went crazy and powered off
constantly, and few days more to Toshiba release the patch, but that's
ok, just another issue for misconception.  You should be correct when
you say that Win98 was done to be a win95 super-patched and fixed, but
then they included a few other little things, and that is the real
problem, isn't?

Long live to who fix problems, without creating new ones!

Wagner