On Tue, Oct 26, 1999 at 04:23:25PM -0500, William J. Kitchen wrote:
> Consider also that flash is little or no advantage for many applications (such
> as low-end mass produced trackballs and mice), so those applications aren't
> going to rush away from otp & mask rom parts even if flash could be had for
> the same price.
The mask parts do not need programming, and the code memory does not deteriorate
with time so are better then flash and OTP parts for such applications.
But why OTP should be better suited for such apps than flash?
--
                        Greetings
                        Wojciech Zabolotny
                        http://www.ise.pw.edu.pl/~wzab

Build your free Data Acquisition System:
http://www.ise.pw.edu.pl/~wzab/picadc/picadc.html