Tony Nixon wrote:
>
> > I'm getting conflicting reports on the availability of the 18C452/JW and
> > the 18C452/PT.

> I wonder why they didn't scrap the JW's, and make them Flash based
> processors. It would seem a more logical flow of technology, and get rid
> of that stupid code protect problem.

One nice thing about JWs: I've tested them successfully to *way* above
their rated temperature spec; I haven't tried that with any flash based
part yet, but I will be with my current project.

--Matt