Niklas Wennerstrand wrote:
>
> If AVR is claming things that is not true time after time I do not blame Micro
chip to write something to their defence. In this truth.pdf file there are both
god and bad things about the PICmicro and my view is that it is written in a obj
ective manner.
> I have Heard AVR seminars where they talked bad about the PICmicro instead of
concentrate on their own products. If someone is telling bad things about their
competitor they probably don have much self-esteem. Some people like the AVR and
 some the PICmicro, so why argue and why just don't leave it at that.
[snip]

It started long ago, I read both sides files and counter-files, I have
my own opinion since it is very easy to verify what is the truth.

Of course, as an example, if someone says that I am "not educated", I
and who knows me will laugh a lot about the joke, and not only based on
my 30 years of electronic experience, 3 languages and 3 university
degrees. But as a company I can start to lose new customers, and this is
what *marketing* is about.

The point is that there are lots of night monsters in the closet, until
you turns on the light. Did you?  You can read the accusations, but you
can also take a look at the products data sheet by yourself.

Wagner.