>> Spoil-sport!  Now how could you possibly disagree with the US
>> Patent Office?  to wit:
>
>  Who's disagreeing?  They don't care, there's no requirement that it
>*works* at all (I gather many don't).  They pay the money, the Patent
>Office takes the money, pays their clerks.  Everyone's happy...



I understood, perhaps naively, that perpetual motion devices were officially
unpatentable.



RM


_____________________________
What can one man do?
Help the hungry at no cost to yourself!
at  http://www.thehungersite.com/