At 17:34 23/09/99 -0400, you wrote:
>At 05:13 PM 9/23/99 -0400, Adam wrote:
>>PLEASE NOTE:  There are not such particles, a permanent magnet has a
>>field which is static.  Einstien was trying to create a 'universal
>>equation' which contained all the forces we experience, but he couldn't
>>figure out magnetism before he died.  It is not a subject we can easily
>>discuss with quantum physics, nevermind without them.  So I made up my
>>own rules for the sake of the argument, and, aside from the words, the
>>description is how static ('permanent') magnetic fields will react with
>>your objects.
>
>Actually, they're still trying to prove the existence of magnetic
>monopoles. There was a NASA experiment about 20 yrs ago that supposedly
>found a trace, but was found to be irreproducible and was presumed to be a
>misread cosmic ray track. Since then, no new news.


What would NASA know, twice now they have lost MARS probes

Dennis


>
>================================================================
>Robert A. LaBudde, PhD, PAS, Dpl. ACAFS  e-mail: ral@lcfltd.com
>Least Cost Formulations, Ltd.                   URL: http://lcfltd.com/
>824 Timberlake Drive                            Tel: 757-467-0954
>Virginia Beach, VA 23464-3239                   Fax: 757-467-2947
>
>"Vere scire est per causae scire"
>================================================================
>
>