At 18:27 16/09/99 -0600, you wrote:
>I thought that the '73, '73A, '74, '74A chips all had the BRGH bug.  The
>'73B and '74B parts were OK.
>
>dwayne

Yes, That is what my table denotes except that I left the 16C74 out of the
table altogether. This is a "WHEN FIXED" table, not a table of all the parts
that do and don't have the BRGH bug though that infomation can be deduced
from this table. (Me being cryptic again???)

Here is the corrected table with the 16C74 added.

Sans suffix 16C66,67,76,77, 16F87X,
"A" 16C63, 16C72, 16C64x, 16C66x
"B" 16C62, 16C64, 16C65, 16C73, 16C74


Hope it makes sense. Does to me but that's no recommendation.

Jim

>
>>At 20:40 15/09/99 -0400, you wrote:
>>
>>
>>Here is my guide to the BRGH problem.
>>
>>This is the "when fixed" list. Of course all later A and B suffixed parts
>>remain fixed.
>>
>>Sans suffix 16C66,67,76,77, 16F87X,
>>"A" 16C63, 16C72, 16C64x, 16C66x
>>"B" 16C62, 16C64, 16C65, 16C73
>>
>
>
>Dwayne Reid   <dwayner@planet.eon.net>
>Trinity Electronics Systems Ltd    Edmonton, AB, CANADA
>(780) 489-3199 voice          (780) 487-6397 fax
>
>Celebrating 15 years of Engineering Innovation (1984 - 1999)
>
>* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>Do NOT send unsolicited commercial email to this email address.
>My posting messages to Usenet neither grants consent to receive
>unsolicited commercial email nor is intended to solicit commercial
>email.
>
Regards,

Jim Robertson
NEWFOUND ELECTRONICS
________________________________________
Email: newfound@pipeline.com.au
http://www.new-elect.com
MPLAB compatible PIC programmers.
________________________________________