Dan Creagan wrote:

> So, Don, are you going to post the updated Microchip source for the
> Stamp code?

  That is what he promised in an earlier message.  I was going to do
much the same but ... so much to do!  Still happy to do some of the
commenting though (if you like Don?).

Tony Nixon wrote:

> for example
> movb pa0,z
> now translates to

> BTFSS status, z
> BCF status, pa0
> BTFSC status, z
> BSF status, pa0

  Is that *exactly* what the Parallax assembler does?  Must be.

  Cute and "high-level", but also rather deceptive, takes a whole *four*
instructions with clock cycles to match.  Not always good to make you
think certain operations are easy when they actually aren't.  IMHO
--
  Cheers,
        Paul B.