Russell McMahon wrote: > More detail would help. As always. From my understanding: > - Is this by telephone (???) or radio or ??? Telephone. Paying STD rates which are now limited to $3.00 between 19:00 and 00:00 local. Yes, it *is* cheaper to use the radio, but apparently some of these enthusiasts are actually not Amateurs! > - Describe how the overall system works. Key and sounder each end. > - Knowing WHY this is done would be interesting. *Not* a useful question to ask a Morse fanatic! > - The 7910 "worldchip" modem IC may still be available ([possibly > surplus) allowing roll yer own still. It is a "legacy" part mostly available ready assembled inside 1200 baud modems. The assertion (which I find curious but...) is that these are becoming hard to find second hand. I would have thought they were rife and to be had for nothing. I collect them occasionally at garage sales, usually for a dollar or two (albeit, may have to buy the whole computer!). > - There are other modem IC's that would handle the data rate. > Depending on how this all works it may be possible to make a very > cheap and simple modem adequate to the task using a single tone > decoder IC eg LM567!!! or a 4046 PLL IC or XR... or .... The users are nervous about hacking telecom stuff, legality, type approval and all that. Besides, that involves *work*! > I am puzzled as to why a modem is needed at all unless there is some > arcane extra feature that you have not mentioned. If you use an audio > circuit then the USER is the modem received with Morse. Dead right. The "arcane extra feature" happens to be the use of sounders for *real* Morse. Many of these sites are historic locations such as Timbertown at Wauchope NSW (near here). Now it makes sense, doesn't it? > If you are using eg a multipoint digital data network it may make > sense. Not so easy to set up using telephone lines (as requires multiple lines). I have proposed that using a contemporary modem and a pre-processor (e.g. PIC = On toPIC) to send a stream of ASCII events marked with a local clock would allow 100% faithful reproduction albeit with a delay (maybe 1 second or so), like Speak Freely etc. Long breaks would allow easy re-synchronisation (a "reset" event) This would be readily adaptable to Internet networking and "nets" etc. with simple hardware. But they (being by definition, backward-looking) say they want backward-compatibility with the present un-framed system which as I have pointed out, just isn't "on"! -- Cheers, Paul B.