On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Dan Larson wrote:

> Does anybody see any problem with the following
> 32-bit increment, other than it not being
> isosynchronous ?
>
> ; 32-bit increment-------------------
>
>        INCFSZ   COUNT_0,F     ;  LSB
>        GOTO     DONE          ;
>        INCFSZ   COUNT_1,F     ;
>        GOTO     DONE          ;
>        INCFSZ   COUNT_2,F     ;
>        GOTO     DONE          ;
>        INCF     COUNT_3       ;  MSB
> DONE:

If you wish to make it isochronous:

  incf   count_0,f
  skpnz
   incf  count_1,f
  skpnz
   incf  count_2,f
  skpnz
   incf  count_3,f

On the 18cxxx parts you could do this:

  infsnz count_0,f
   incf  count_1,f
  skpnz
   incf  count_2,f
  skpnz
   incf  count_3,f

or
  clrf   wreg
  setc
  addwfc count_0,f
  addwfc count_1,f
  addwfc count_2,f
  addwfc count_3,f

Scott