Paul B. Webster VK2BZC wrote:
> <snipped>
> anyway?  How many people have even seen a version 2.x?

  I have, on multiple machines <G>  I like Compaq Dos 3.31 better,
though.  I think I may have V1.1 or some such here someplace on floppy?
Ick, though...

> > When they needed hierarchical directory support for hard drives, they
> > did a disgusting job of sort of kludging it so that it has some
> > trivial superficial similarities to Unix.  However, this similarity
> > was never more than skin deep.
>
>   Sure.  It's hierarchical, and there ends all similarity.  FAT instead
> of Inodes, like TRS-DOS and presumably, CP/M (of which I know very
> little).

  Dos is not much like CP/M, really, IMHO.

> <snipped>

  Mark