At 08:47 AM 5/17/99 -0500, Jerry Merrill wrote:
>At 10:52 AM 5/15/99 +0200, Dr. Imre Bartfai wrote:
>>Hi,
>>a remark to this:
>>the listing output of SPASM could be used by PSIM, but the listing output
>>of CVASM not. I guess it depends on the listing header.
>
>This is probably because we changed CVASM's list file format some time back
>to provide absolute register addresses for all defined symbols.  Earlier
>versions only encoded the OFFSET within a bank, making it impossible for
>TDE to properly track variables in upper RAM banks.

   This was the first major change from SPASM. You use to have to originate
registers at the same bank 0 address and `fiddle' with RP0/RP1...

>>Do intend TechTools to further develop also PSIM?
>>

   PSIM was a `dead horse' long before TechTools took over... I use to use
it when I was starting out with the 16C84 and 16C71. It would be nice to
have an updated version but it's out of Parallax and TechTools's hands...

   - Tom