Jerry, I have another suggestion for your documentation update. It would
help to add a short section on converting Microchip syntax to CVASM. The
obvious difference is the radix syntax. The Microchip conversion list
already covers fr and fr,W as well as the special instructions such as SKPC.
You could put in a short note about macros and the need to `unroll' them.
One problem that shows up a lot is operations using the STATUS register as
in the following example:

      Problem:                 Fix:
      BTFSS   STATUS,C    ->   BTFSS   C    or   BTFSS   STATUS,0
      BTFSS   STATUS,DC   ->   BTFSS   DC   or   BTFSS   STATUS,1
      BTFSS   STATUS,Z    ->   BTFSS   Z    or   BTFSS   STATUS,2

   While CVASM will pass STATUS,C the other two will generate a Bit range
error. The fact that it passes C is a minor `quirk'. C, DC, and Z are
defined as Bit definitions (STATUS.0/1/2) as opposed to literals. What
would really be nice is to have the assembler recognize and convert the
STATUS,C/DC/Z syntax.

   The above should cover the majority of problems. You might want to just
add a few paragraphs below the syntax conversion lists. This would help
folks that have had reservations about using CVASM with all the native
syntax examples.

   - Tom