Your efforts have been a source of inspiration for many. The work you have done is/was excellent. I have not tried the Maplin version, but I do use on a daily basis the DIY programmer - it's great. You get my vote. Rgds... ...Andy At 17:59 10/02/99 +0000, you wrote: >> Hey, Andy, I've been hinting - send me a web reference to or >> e-mail of the Maplin programmer circuit and let's try and get >> it going. > >The Maplin programmer is more or less the same as the ASCII sketch in >the file pic84pgm.zip (all programs mentioned are in my PIC archive). >It should work with the software in pic84v05.zip and numerous other >programs available on the web. It is a kit and I'm sure some people >have difficulties because they have not built the thing correctly. >Other problems are for the most part fixed by using a short connection >from PC to programmer, adding a 4.7k pullup from ACK to +5V and, like >a lot of these parallel port designs, adding a couple of 100-470pF >caps from RB6/7 to ground. From what Andy says Maplin don't give >users a lot of support. They have bundled some of my old software >with their kit and so I get a few moans sent to me, but to be fair I >also hear from people who didn't have any problems. PC speed is often >cited as a problem and that may be true for some PCs. I tried hard to >make the pic84v05.zip software as processor speed independent as I >could but I rely on the PC timer chip working the way I think it >should (you can check that by running tchk.exe from topic03.zip). > >> > otherwise I recall that people have mantioned problems with incorrect >> > diode sourcing on the D.T. programmer. > >I have at least 5 programmer designs on my web site and I'm not sure >which is the most likely culprit here - perhaps my 16C5X programmer as >I specify a Schottky diode for one component. > >> The design does appear to be a bit dodgy and substitution of the wrong >> *brand* of part could be the problem. > >Sorry about that. Apart from some head scratching when I was putting >together my very first prototype I've never had any problems with my >designs. Because of that I was happy to make them available for free >so that others could have some fun too. If my designs are really >"dodgy" and causing people lots of frustration it would pain me a lot. >Nowadays I can only deal with a fraction of the mail that my >programmer stuff and web pages attract (which gives me a permanent >guilty feeling) but at one time I spent a lot of time trying to help >people get their programmers working. I wasn't 100% successful as >trying to fix software/hardware by e-mail is not easy. On balance I >think my stuff is still useful but perhaps I'm wrong. > >David >-- >http://www.man.ac.uk/~mbhstdj >