Dwayne Reid wrote: > The only thing that I found non-intuitive was that TE coolers do NOT > like PWM power - I always found better efficiency if the PWM was > smoothed to DC first. This relates back to the thread on LED brightness. The difference is that the series chain of Peltier modules achieves a higher voltage drop and runs at significant power making it really worthwhile to use SMPS techniques. The equivalent curcuit for a Peltier device is a "back EMF" proportional in significant degree to the temperature differential, in series with an internal resistance. Power dissipated in the EMF equivalent does useful work (cooling) whilst power disssipated in the internal resistance is deleterious to performance (it actually heats the "cold" side!). The significant point is that the "back EMF" is very much a constant. PWM without an inductor and commutation diode, preferably a capacitor also, simply biases the internal resistance much harder for a fraction of the time. Unfortunately, the power dissipated by this resistance varies as the square of the current, whilst power achieving useful work in the "back EMF" (situation is identical in a motor, BTW) varies directly with the current. IOW, delivering twice the current for half the time generates twice as much waste heat. In a motor, this is a minor nuisance but can perhaps be designed around. In a Peltier cooler however, it is absolutely antithetical to the primary goal. The other aspect of PWM, indeed as I am given to understand, frequent and repeated cycling of the power, is that the thermal response of these devices is instant and their thermal mass quite small. You will thus produce a thermal alternation and through expansion, a mechanical oscillation which is stressing the structure of the device. Not a Good Thing, so I am told. It is recommended to drive them with a power supply which ramps up the drive current relatively slowly and keeps it constant. Raw DC from a battery charger is not advisable. A well-designed SMPS, more to the point. -- Cheers, Paul B.