Peter L. Peres wrote:

> BTW the proper net name for this is 'a troll'.

  Sorry, ignoramus that I am (or just had an internal Thesaurus
match failure, late at night as now), it *was indeed* a Troll.

>  Apart from that, the forwarded message will generate an inordinate
> amount of response info from LISTSERV, flooding the poor responder's
> mailbox.

  Well, those that actually sent it to LISTSERV will pay the price that
way I daresay but the list members will never see their embarrassment.
I'm not even going to try it for fun (noting that it is after all,
harmless).

> No, I think that PIClisters are invited to take the monthly have-you-
> rtfm and IQ test.

  So what do you make the current tally who blurted it to the *list*.  I
think about ten or so?  Actually, that's not too bad a figure I suppose,
out of the 1800 you keep quoting (and who gave you *that* figure?).
--
  Cheers,
        Paul B.