Chip Weller <PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU> wrote:

> I should have said a test case of 0x00FFxx where xx is anything but
> 00. Using 0x00FF01 and your outline:
> ....
> result off by 0x010000

    You're correct, Chip... Thanks for catching the error.

    Bob:  Please ignore my "solution".

    -Andy


=== Andrew Warren - fastfwd@ix.netcom.com
=== Fast Forward Engineering - Vista, California
=== http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/2499