Tom, thanks for posting this. While I take this for granted in ICs I have'nt considered this circuit in a long time. I was also thinking Darlington. I had earlier made a comment about how many questions asked in this group force us to visit subjects we have'nt looked at in a long time and this is a good example. - Tom At 09:41 AM 7/26/98 -0400, Tom McGahee wrote: >Dwayne, >Have you considered using a Direct Coupled Compound (DCC) arrangement? This >has the gain advantage of a Darlington, but has only one forward >diode drop (Vbe drop). A DCC has gain = Beta1*Beta2. The 'device' has the >characteristics of the input transistor. A disgusting ascii drawing follows. > >***************************************************** >Direct Coupled Compound (DCC). "NPN" Equivalent Shown. >One Vbe forward diode drop. Gain=Gain_npn*Gain_pnp > > Effective Collector > | > | > PNP V (E) > |/ > ------| > NPN |/ |\ >Base--------| | (C) > |\ | > V | > | | > --------* > | > | > Effective Emitter > >******************************************************* >Add this to your 'collection'. > >Hope this helps. >Fr. Tom McGahee > >> >> > Hi! >> > >> > I'm looking for recomendations for TO-220 NPN and PNP transistors that have >> > moderate current gains at about 1 Amp. Should be good for at least 40V, >hfe >> > greater than 100, reasonably robust. My old standbys TIP31, TIP32, TIP41, >> > TIP42 don't have enough gain and the TIP120 - TIP127 are darlingtons and >> > have too much voltage drop. I don't need complimentary pairs so unmatched >> > parts are fine. North American part numbers preferred. Any thoughts? >> > >> > Thanks! >> > >> > dwayne >> > >> > >> > Dwayne Reid >> > Trinity Electronics Systems Ltd Edmonton, AB, CANADA >> > (403) 489-3199 voice (403) 487-6397 fax >> > > > Tom Handley New Age Communications Since '75 before "New Age" and no one around here is waiting for UFOs...