At 08:54 28/07/98 +1000, you wrote:
>David Sorlien wrote:
>> Here's my problem. The 16F84's program just fine, but cannot be read by
>> the PP. I verified correct programming by desoldering the 'F84 and
>> using a PICStart Plus.
>
>If it wasn't for your testing with the PICStart Plus I would have said
>perhaps the 16F84 is different to the 16C84 in that the code protect
>bits are inverted.

How long is this sort of misinformation going to be circulated on the
piclist?
I believe this is about the forth time this has come up in the last two
weeks.

It is the PWRTE bit that is inverted not the code protect bits.

Jim Robertson.

>James Cameron                              (james.cameron@digital.com)
>Digital Equipment Corporation (Australia) Pty. Ltd. A.C.N. 000 446 800
>
--------------------------------------------------------
Jim Robertson
NEWFOUND ELECTRONICS
Email: newfound@pipeline.com.au
http://www.pipeline.com.au/users/newfound
--------------------------------------------------------