Walter Banks wrote:
> What tools would you like to see
> ported to run under Linux?

None at all.  I'll support coding efforts that result in GPL'd source
code, but "porting" implies taking proprietary code and recompiling it
to run on Linux.  I don't see this as useful.  If the costs of
proprietary code are a match to my project, then I'll choose that.

I'm about to add 12C509 support to James Bowman's gpasm.

I've used MPASM within Linux's DOS emulator.  It works fine, but is
sluggish by comparison to gpasm.  No source code either.

I'm patiently waiting for GEDA to get off the ground.

--
James Cameron                              (james.cameron@digital.com)
Digital Equipment Corporation (Australia) Pty. Ltd. A.C.N. 000 446 800