Hi, I completely agree; though I prefer serial port due to parallel as I have timing problems with a Cyrix PR-200MMX despite PIPELOOP, but the real Parallax programmer is very fine. And now the bad news: Parallax had informed me they stopped to support their programmer and they gave it away to Carmacon. So far, so good. My real problem is: I do not use Window$ due to technical and practical reasons. I am now going to try the parallel programmer of Bojan Dobaj. Though it is also a parallel port programmer, but it has a text format configuration file where one can insert new processor types. If the project ready, I'll report. I think the shareware fee of $20 is modest compared with the quality of the stuff. Imre On Thu, 2 Jul 1998, Mark Willis wrote: > Andy Kunz wrote: > > > > >>> Come to think of it, I'd better upgrade my older Parallax programmer > > >>> for this programming change! > > > > > >Parallax? Good luck! > > > > Jim, > > > > He probably means the Parallax programmer with the Carmacon software in it. > > > > Andy > > > > ================================================================== > > Andy Kunz - Statistical Research, Inc. - Westfield, New Jersey USA > > ================================================================== > > Parallax has a $50 firmware upgrade available on their web pages; > I've had that programmer for over a year, it needs more recent device > support anyways (unless I just use the PCPlus for recent chips.) > > I much prefer Parallel port interfaces, serial ports aren't commonly > free on my machines & everything else I develop embedded stuff with is > parallel-based, EMP-20 & the Parallax unit, I had to add a serial port & > lose modem use on my embedded machine to get the use of the PCPlus > programmer; I seriously doubt I'll change the Parallax unit over to > Carmacon style, unless there's some real advantage to doing so, to me! > > (Had to stop PIC work for much of a year due to work, and moving, so > maybe there's something I don't know here.) > > Mark, mwillis@nwlink.com > >