Bob Blick Pontificated: > I use PADS, and am current with my maintenance contract on it, so I > can safely comment about the new versions. I have never had a crash. > The windows 95 interface is pretty complete, though I have not > tested OLE to a great extent. It does all the testing and > engineering changes to and from schematic and pcb, warns me if I > have clearance or other errors, does not route shorts into the > board, every board I design comes out of the PCB house looking and > working like I designed it. I take back every mean thing I ever said about Pads. > > The downside is cost. PADS has raised their prices incredibly in the > years I've been using it. My yearly maintenance bill this year will > be around $1400. Every year I promise myself I will change to > something else, and I think this is the year. That's OK, AutoCad is $2000. If you are like me, and need AutoCad anyway, it's a bargain. I wouldn't pop $2000 if all I was doing was electronics. >I think Eagle looks > pretty good, for a "semi-pro" package. I've tried the demo, but I'd > like to test the real thing for a while, too bad it doesn't come > with a trial period. I should have tried out the cracked version > when it was floating around(hey, a legitimate use for cracked > software!). I'll be trying Eagle as soon as I get win 95 running on my antiquated Model A Stone Age box (hear that, boss?) > > Autocad is fine if you know it well and do very simple boards. > Otherwise use a dedicated schematic-pcb-autorouter package. It > automates things nicely and you don't need to stay quite so alert to > errors. I like to sleep soundly. > > Just my two cents... Worth much more than 2 cents. I'd agree. Most of my designs are simple single sided boards, and I spend labor dollars doing things that are automatic in other software packages. On the other hand, it would be really neat if someone built an add-on that did schematic capture in AutoCad. It is possible. I always get frustrated with dedicated CAD packages, becuase the drawing interface, the ability to easily draw, move, copy, etc., is never as smooth as in Acad. Best Regards, Lawrence Lile