Marco DI LEO wrote: > I think I found the nature of the problem you are experimenting with > my TEA code. > .... > I ran the program and I GOT THE SAME RESULT YOU REPORTED!! > > While I was thinking about the possible cause of this strange > behaviour, a ligth bulb suddenly shined over me, I .... set the > processor to SIMulate a PIC16_F_84 [rather than a 16C84] and > everything went just fine. I guess there are some problems to get a > processor with 36 bytes of RAM running a program that needs 37 of > them!! > > Please check if you have this sort of problem in your > configuration and let me know if the error went away. Marco: That was the problem; my simulator was set for the 16C84. -Andy === Andrew Warren - fastfwd@ix.netcom.com === Fast Forward Engineering - Vista, California === http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/2499 (personal) === http://www.netcom.com/~fastfwd (business)