> Van: myke predko > Aan: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU > Onderwerp: Re: pseudo-asm > Datum: dinsdag 12 mei 1998 16:02 [Cut] > I have been steering beginners, when I've been asked, away from using these > pseudo-assembler instructions because while they do make programming the > PIC easier, they make understanding the bit operations less intuitive. Did you ever try to 'skip' a macro-instruction ? btfsc {register},7 ;Is it negative negf {register} ;Yes : make it positive ; negf := comf and incf together Boy, do you have a lot of fun ! By the way : Pseudo-instructions and macro's are not the same ... You _need_ pseudo instructructions like 'org' , 'db' , 'dw' and 'dt'. > On these points, what do other people think? When I see a snippet using the > "psuedo-assembler" or PAX assembler, for the most part I can figure out what > the instructions are doing, but I don't find them more efficient to use for > coding with at all. That's about what i'm thinking too. > myke Greetz, Rudy Wieser