Bill Cornutt wrote:
>
> ----------
> No need to do anything for 'ones' as the result of the above
> subtractions will leave the ones value.  But the test may should
> be 'greater or equal'.

Yer right. And I wrote the above without reference to my code sO I
forgot I'd done that. Honest.
>
> And a right shift of the 200 value gives a 100 value.   The same
> shifting 80 to get the next compare/subtraction value...
> Is a shift quicker than a load?
>
> Also if the 'test for 80' is true, then no need to 'test for 40'

But I didn't do that. Thanks.

>
> Bill C.   bill@corutt.com
>

--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Savage                    chris@cti-vision.demon.co.uk
Software Engineer               +44 385 396 993
CTIVision Ltd, Egham, UK
----------------------------------------------------------------