Oops, Obviously the "X.25" should read "AX.25"

And follow this link to the definition of V 2.2 of the spec:
 http://www.tapr.org/tapr/html/ax25.html.

Tom

On Saturday, March 21, 1998 12:15 PM, Tom Mariner
 [SMTP:Tom_Mariner@EMAIL.MSN.COM] wrote:
> Hola Mark,
>
> Since tnc's talk X.25, I would start at
> http://www.arrl.org/catalog/index.html, the catalog page of the Amateur
> Radio Relay League. I would order the book Practical Packet Radio, by Stan
> Horzepa.
> We have done some applications in X.25 in parts from 16C54's to 16C74's and
> they work great. The HDLC-style protocol is medium complex, but is designed
> for networks that have RF as the physical layer. The code, however, belongs
> to our clients and / or us.
>