> Given how many people on the list seemed enthusiastic about the Scenix part > before it was released, I'm surprised that there hasn't been more discussion > of it on the list lately. Is anyone out there using it, or are Rich, Loren, > and I the only ones? Getting the emulation part going would probably help. I've had parts, an SX-Key and V0.2 for about a month, although I didn't get a demo board (and V0.3) until a few days ago. I wrote a bit of code for it and have a play but there isn't really much to get excited about or discuss, since it's just like a PIC only faster. Oh. I did notice that if you are using a sig gen for a clock source and bump the +20dB button, it stops working permenantly. Oops ! :-) I find it rather odd that Parallax have added so many instructions (macros) in the assembler. One of the things I like about the PIC (and is used as a selling point) is that there aren't very many instructions to remember. ie. Less to get wrong. I can understand it being useful for those that don't like changing between micro families, but I'd really like to be able to turn that ability off. I particularly don't like the ones that trash W. Looks like Loren Blaney has a similar opinion of the assembler. The SxProg looks like a useful tool. > The biggest drawback > I've found so far is trying to use two virtual peripherals that each want > a different interrupt rate. I was expecting something along those lines when they talked of virtual peripherals. Looks like a small multi-tasking executive could be the next challenge for the list. Steve. ====================================================== Very funny Scotty. Now beam down my clothes. ====================================================== Steve Baldwin Electronic Product Design TLA Microsystems Ltd Microcontroller Specialists PO Box 15-680 email: steveb@kcbbs.gen.nz New Lynn, Auckland ph +64 9 820-2221 New Zealand fax +64 9 820-1929 ======================================================