> So here is my question:  Why doesn't anyone mention or recommend the
> PicStart+?!
> It is $149, which is cheaper than some of the less-capable third party

It's now $200.  That was a temporary special price.

> programmers, it programs ALL PIC's, (except the 17 series, unless you have
> an adaptor), it can be used on a Mac or a PC (unlike parallel programmers),
> it is very reliable, and has support from Microchip.

Reliable?  Won't program 16C73s for me whereas ITU Tech programmer will.

> Unless you are trying not to spend more than $50, or don't care about
> programming anything except an 84, it seems like the obvious choice.

Why spend the $200 when $50 will do?

Orin.