I still prefer SCCS.  It's all command line, and I like it's
implementation.
Perhaps it is just indoctrination.

Does anyone know if it is available for Windoze or just Doze?

I'm currently in the process of writing a sockets driver to a Linux machine
so I can use Linux as my control machine.  Then you don't have problems
with your Win95 box scribbling your file locking or your files..

I have PVCS integrated into Borland 5.1.  This GUI seems to be fairly
intuitive, but it is the stripped down version.

Craig

----------
> From: Alan G. Smith <ags@POBOXES.COM>
> To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> Subject: Re: Revision Control
> Date: Friday, March 06, 1998 4:52 AM
>
>
> >Perhaps a few people would be willing to share their experiences.
>
> I have used PVCS (command line and GUI), Source Safe, and RCS.
>
> Personally, I prefer them in this order:
> Source Safe -
>     incredibly EASY to use and works intuitively
> (has command line interface for batches, interfaces pretty easily to most
> environments)
> PVCS (commandline) -
>      Great for command line/make projects.  Most environments come with
> an interface for it.
> PVCS (GUI)
>     The GUI is AWFUL!!!  It is not intuitive and is easy to make a
mistake.
> Sharing files between
> projects exposes the user to too much information for how it works.
> However, PVCS is a champ
> at branches and such.
>
> RCS -
>     Well, you get what you pay for.........  (But this is still better
than
> nothing)
>
> HTH,
>
> Alan G. Smith
>
>
>
>
> +---------------------------------------------------------
> | Alan G. Smith
> | ags@poboxes.com
> | http://www.innovatus.com/ags