At 12:40 AM 2/20/98 +0100, you wrote:
>[]  > If code protect is set off, they verify fine.
>[]  > If code protect is set on, they fail verify (but work fine).
>
>Conclusion: "Code Protect" must have something to do with read-protecting the
>code.

Gee, you think?  :-)

The 16C84s verify properly with code protect set.