Perhaps you'd like to post the improved code?
(provided, of course, that it satisfies the requirements of
code found on the internet as per another thread :-))


>On Mon, 9 Feb 1998, Scott Newell wrote:
>
>  And don't forget that the sqrt routine chews up 3,000
some odd cycles,
>  for a poor aproximation, when the exact result can be
gotten in less than
>  200 cycles.
>
>> [...]
>