Egg on my face again.

Someonw wrote:

>>I have seen two solutions to this question.  My question is there a reason to
>>avoid
>>
>>INCFSZ counter1,F
>>INCF    counter2, F

Then I wrote:

>Close, but no cigar.  If you notice, BOTH counters increment except when
>counter1 rolls over to zero.

Then Scott wrote:

Wait a second Andy, it does work... If you make a slight MODification.
You oughta remember since it was your idea. The trick is
(with counter1 and counter2 initially zero):

(code deleted)

Thanks, guys!  It **IS** a neat code snippet.

I do like this list.  Get up, get mail, learn something new.  I LOVE it!!

dwayne
Dwayne Reid   <dwayner@planet.eon.net>
Trinity Electronics Systems Ltd    Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA
(403) 489-3199 voice     (403) 487-6397 fax